Abdulswamad Sheriff Nassir

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 651 to 660 of 1018.

• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Are you on a point of order? view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Forgive me, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, but some people do not know their Standing Orders. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: My apologies, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. We are going back to the old regime where powers on matters relating to land were a preserve of the Central Government. When we say that Sub-section 4 talks about a sub-county select committee, we kill the whole sense of public involvement. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: I am. It will be nice if my colleague can read it. The whole intention is to read through the document and understand what it means. We are now looking at--- view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: I am, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 95 of the Bill be deleted. The Committee is proposing that the issues be handled by what was then called “District Commissioners (DCs)” by calling them “sub-county administrations”. We should remember that the offices of the sub-county commissioners are still non-existent. I would like the Committee to show me where in law the office of the sub-county commissioner is stipulated. The previous Government had this in place and the current Government wants to carry it. We are going back to the same point of DCs. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Is the Member for Bahati in order to tell me that I have a problem and cannot read? I want to assure him that my parents gave me good education. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: My sister, Hon. (Ms.) Naomi Shaban has indicated issues that representation as purported by the Committee in the proposed amendment is fair enough. She should have seen the original Act which has the representation of the people who are the rightful owners of that land. It is not right to have a committee selected by a CS who has probably never even seen the administered land. Let it be on record that the original Land Act of what is being repealed by this Committee is the one that talks about the face of the people on the ground. view